An Ecuadorian Gang Becomes a 'Terrorist Organization'
What Designation Actually Does

← Back to Latin America News

On July 1, 2026, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the designation of the Ecuadorian criminal group Chone Killers as both a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). The designation took effect the following day, July 2, upon publication in the Federal Register. Treating Latin American criminal groups as terrorist organizations has become a standard instrument of US regional policy over the past two years. This piece sets out what the designation legally does — and what it does not.

What happened: a double designation from the State Department

The designating authority is the State Department, not the Treasury. The legal bases are Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which underpins the FTO listing, and Executive Order 13224, which underpins the SDGT listing. The State Department's statement cites repeated attacks on civilians, law enforcement officers and government officials, including high-profile assassinations of public figures.

Ecuador's foreign ministry welcomed the move, saying it reflected firm US support for President Daniel Noboa's decision to sustain an all-out fight against criminal organizations (Al Jazeera).

This is not the first Ecuadorian group on the list. Los Choneros and Los Lobos were designated as FTOs and SDGTs in September 2025. Counting Brazil's PCC (previously covered) and Venezuela's Tren de Aragua (previously covered), the number of Latin American organizations designated since 2025 now runs into the high teens.

The legal effects: three concrete consequences

The consequences of an FTO/SDGT listing fall into roughly three categories. First, knowingly providing "material support or resources" to the group becomes a federal crime in the United States. Second, the group's property and interests in property within US jurisdiction are blocked. Third, members are in principle barred from entering the country.

What matters is that all three operate inside US jurisdiction. The designation creates no new arrest or operational authority inside Ecuador. It bites where the group's money touches dollar-clearing networks or US financial institutions, or where associates try to enter the United States. Ecuador uses the US dollar as its currency, so that surface of contact is wider than in most countries — but the label is still not the same thing as enforcement on the ground.

Two accounts of who the Chone Killers are

There is a gap between the official account of the group's origins and the account given by researchers. The State Department says it emerged as a faction of Los Choneros before splintering off in 2020. InSight Crime, the organized-crime research outlet, traces its roots instead to the Ecuadorian offshoot of the Netas, a prison gang originating in Puerto Rico, with its power base in Durán near Guayaquil, and describes the name as an homage to an alliance with the Choneros boss. Both accounts agree on the turning point: the 2020 killing of that boss collapsed the confederation and left the group operating on its own.

What exists today is not a single organization. According to InSight Crime, police count at least five separate factions fighting over territory within Durán alone, while the group's prominent leaders are dead, imprisoned or in hiding. Much of the violence is between factions using the same name rather than attacks directed outward.

The question: does designation work?

Steven Dudley, co-director of InSight Crime, notes that the group numbers a few hundred members with essentially no international operations, and questions the choice of target itself. Analysts also raise a practical problem: when an organization is fragmented, membership is fluid, and people adopt the "brand" opportunistically, businesses and banks have little way of telling who actually falls under the designation.

The numbers give further reason for caution. InSight Crime's 2025 homicide tally puts Ecuador's murder rate at 50.9 per 100,000 — up 31 percent from 2024 and the worst since at least 2014. That period predates the Choneros and Lobos designations, but the cycle it reflects is familiar: arresting leaders splinters organizations and triggers fresh turf wars (previously covered). At least 75 people were killed in four prison riots during 2025.

What has moved since

Two weeks after the designation, from July 12 to 14, the commander of US Southern Command, Gen. Francis Donovan, visited Ecuador and met the chief of the Ecuadorian Joint Command, Gen. Henry Delgado Salvador. According to SOUTHCOM, the agenda was coordinating action against narco-terrorism under the Americas Counter Cartel Coalition (ACCC), and Donovan also toured Ecuadorian military units. As of now there is no public record of further sanctions designations or new joint operations specifically targeting the Chone Killers since the designation took effect.

That deepening cooperation sits in tension with domestic politics. In the referendum of November 16, 2025, all four questions put forward by Noboa were rejected; 60.75 percent voted against lifting the ban on foreign military bases. Practical cooperation is advancing in a direction voters declined to endorse (related: previously covered).

My perspective

Terrorist designation is a tool for financially isolating an organization. Against groups that move money across borders and touch the formal financial system, it genuinely works — all the more so for an outfit like Tren de Aragua that operates abroad. By the same logic, attaching the same label to a few hundred people confined to a handful of neighborhoods creates a mismatch between the instrument and the target. The unease analysts have expressed is best read not as opposition to designation as such, but as a design question: is this the right tool for this object?

Line up Ecuador's security policy over the past two years and the direction is consistent. The January 2024 declaration of an "internal armed conflict," recurring states of emergency and military deployment, mass arrests of leaders, and now the institutionalization of military and law-enforcement cooperation with Washington. The intensity keeps rising. That homicides have not fallen does not by itself refute the approach, but it does show that the assumption behind it — turn up the pressure and the killing goes down — is not holding. It is the same reason Ecuador is cited as the case that revealed the limits of the Salvadoran-style iron-fist model now spreading across the region (previously covered).

Three indicators to watch. First, whether prosecutions or asset freezes actually follow from the designation inside the United States; the measure of a listing is enforcement volume, not the listing itself. Second, Ecuador's monthly homicide figures, especially for Durán and Guayaquil. Third, how the incoming Colombian government of Abelardo de la Espriella, sworn in on August 7, coordinates with Ecuador and the United States on the cross-border trafficking routes. A designation is a label, not a policy.

Glossary

Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) = designated by the Secretary of State under Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) = an asset-blocking designation under Executive Order 13224. material support = money, goods or services; providing it to an FTO is a US federal crime. conflicto armado interno = "internal armed conflict," the status Ecuador's government declared in January 2024.

A designation is a label, not a policy. The real question is what gets built after the name is attached.

※ This article is the author’s commentary based on public information. Please confirm the latest figures, dates and procedures with governments and primary sources. Quotations are kept minimal and sources are cited.